EXPOSING "THE PINELLAS COUNTY ELECTION FRAUD MAFIA"

CHRISTOPHER GLEASON vs PINELLAS COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS & THE POWER OF JUDICIAL NOTICE

May 10, 2023

Judicial review “does not ‘by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power’ but rather ‘supposes that the power of the people is superior to both quoting THE FEDERALIST NO. 78, at 467–68 (Alexander Hamilton)

Knowledge is power. Truth is truth.

Yesterday, at 11:26 AM I filed a motion for Judicial Notice in the case against the Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections office, Julie Marcus the Supervisor of Elections, and Dustin Chase the Deputy Supervisor of Elections.

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE DOCUMENT

What is “Judicial Notice”? The Florida Rule of Evidence authorizes a court to take judicial notice of its own records, the records of other Florida courts, and records from any other state or federal court of the United States. Section 90.201, Florida Statutes, lists matters that a court MUST take judicial notice of, including:

1. Decisional, constitutional, and public statutory law and resolutions of the Florida Legislature and the Congress of the United States.

2. Florida rules of court that have statewide application, its own rules, and the rules of United States courts adopted by the United States Supreme Court.

3. Rules of court of the United States Supreme Court and of the United States Courts of Appeal.

In my filing, I outlined the numerous court decisions, Constitutional and public statutory laws that supported my numerous public records requests related to election data, official election reports, and the illicit acts, neglect of duty, and corrupt practices occurring within the Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections Office under the authority of Julie Marcus and Dustin Chase.

Putting together the Motion for Judicial Notice was an excellent exercise for me personally. I am not an attorney, so the legal research to put the Judicial Notice together took some time. However, it gave me a far better understanding of just how corrupt the practices of the Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections are. It also gave me insight into the greater operations of the “Florida Election Fraud Mafia” operating across the entire state of Florida.

With the passing of the toxic, treasonous, and UNCONSTITUTIONAL “Florida Election Fraud Legalization Act” aka SB7050 by the Florida legislature, then the stunning revelations of how the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections office was also forging, altering, and uttering “Official Elections Documents” last week everything has become crystal clear to me.

The “Florida Election Fraud Mafia” and the beneficiaries of their subversive activities are doing everything that they can to prevent the ability of “We the People” to hold them accountable for their subversion of our Constitutional Republic and Constitutional government of, by and for the people.

ALL GOVERNMENT POWER IS DERIVED FROM THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED - “We the People” derive our Natural Rights from GOD. In order to protect these rights we come together in agreement and created a CONSTITUTION, which then creates government.

The Constitution RESTRAINS government.

State legislatures are created by state constitutions, a state’s ‘legislature’ was not just an entity created to represent the people; it was an entity created and constrained by the state constitution. State legislatures are forbidden from violating the constitutions that created them; just as Congress is created and constrained by the U.S. Constitution, a state legislature is created and constrained by its respective state constitution.

The Florida Constitution guarantees the right of access to public records in Article I, Section 24.
Chapter 119 of the Florida Statutes, governs the public’s right to access
public records and requires that such records be made available to the public upon
request, subject only to certain limited exemptions.
The right to vote is sacred and it is the cornerstone of our Constitutional Republic. This right to vote is protected in Florida Statute 101.031 – Voter’s Bill of Rights - Each registered voter in this state has the right to:
#1. Vote and have his or her vote accurately counted.
#9. Vote on a voting system that is in working condition and that will allow
votes to be accurately cast.
Florida courts have decided while certain records may be exempt from
disclosure under Chapter 119, these exemptions must be narrowly construed and
must not be used to shield information that should be available to the public. State
v. City of Clearwater, 863 So. 2d 149, 155 (Fla. 2003): "when the public's interest
in disclosure outweighs the governmental interest in maintaining the
confidentiality of the records, the records must be disclosed".
Florida courts have further held that the exemption for trade secrets does not
apply to records that were created or received by a public agency in the course of
its official duties. See Palm Beach Post v. Schermerhorn, 937 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 4th
DCA 2006).
Florida courts have recognized that when a requester can demonstrate a
legitimate public interest in the exempted records that outweigh the reasons for
keeping them confidential, access may be granted. See Wait v. Florida Power &
Light Co., 372 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1979).
The court held that in Brechner v. Fla. State Univ., 992 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2008) the exemption for trade secrets does not apply to records that were
created or received by a public agency in the course of its official duties.
The courts have held that the public had a right to access the contract because it
involved a public agency and the expenditure of public funds. Palm Beach
Newspapers, Inc. v. Palm Beach County Health Care Dist., 745 So. 2d 752 (Fla.
4th DCA 1999).
The courts have held public records that are relevant to the issues in pending
litigation and are not exempt from disclosure in Times Publishing Co. v. State, 558
So. 2d 487, 491 (Fla. 1990).
The court held in Sarasota Herald-Tribune v. Sarasota County Sheriff's Office,
912 So. 2d 769, 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005): "the applicability of an exemption to a
public record must be determined in light of the purpose of the request and the
circumstances of the request".
Florida Statute 98.098(2)(a) Within 30 days after certification by the
Elections Canvassing Commission of a presidential preference primary election,
special election, primary election, or general election, the supervisors of elections
SHALL collect and submit to the department precinct-level election results for the election in a uniform electronic format specified by paragraph (c). The precinct-level election results shall be compiled separately for the primary or special primary election that preceded the general or special general election, respectively.
The results SHALL specifically include for each precinct the total of all
ballots cast for each candidate or nominee to fill a national, state, county, or
district office or proposed constitutional amendment, with subtotals for each
candidate and ballot type. However, ballot type or precinct subtotals in a race or
question having fewer than 30 voters voting on the ballot type or in the precinct
may not be reported in precinct results. “All ballots cast” means ballots cast by
voters who cast a ballot whether at a precinct location, by vote-by-mail ballot
including overseas vote-by-mail ballots, during the early voting period, or by
provisional ballot.
Florida Statute 104.21 Changing electors’ ballots.—Whoever fraudulently
changes or attempts to change the vote or ballot of any elector, by which actions
such elector is prevented from voting such ballot or from voting such ballot as the
elector intended, is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in
s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
Any supervisor, deputy supervisor, or election employee who attempts to
influence or interfere with any elector voting a ballot commits a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
Florida Statute 831.02 Uttering forged instruments.—Whoever utters and
publishes as true a false, forged or altered record, deed, instrument or other writing mentioned in s. 831.01 knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or
counterfeited, with intent to injure or defraud any person, shall be guilty of a
felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
775.084.
Florida Statute 876.23 Subversive activities unlawful; penalty.—
(1) It shall be a felony for any person knowingly and willfully to:
(a) Commit, attempt to commit, or aid in the commission of any act intended to
overthrow, destroy, to assist the overthrow or destruction of the constitutional form of the Government of the United States, or of the state, or any political subdivision of either of them, by revolution, force, violence, or other unlawful means; or
(b) Advocate, abet, advise, or teach by any means any person to commit,
attempt to commit, or assist in the commission of any such act under such
circumstances as to constitute a clear and present danger to the security of the
United States, or of this state, or of any political subdivision of either of them; or
(c) Conspire with one or more persons to commit any such act; or
(d) Assist in the formation or participate in the management or to contribute to
the support of any subversive organization or foreign subversive organization
knowing said organization to be a subversive organization or a foreign subversive
organization; or
(e) Destroy any books, records, or files, or secrete any funds in this state of a
subversive organization or a foreign subversive organization, knowing said
organization to be such.
(2) Any person who violates any of the provisions of this section shall be
guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s.
775.083, or s. 775.084.
Florida Statute 876.28 Grand jury to investigate violations of ss. 876.22-
876.31.—The judge of any court exercising general criminal jurisdiction when in
his or her discretion it appears appropriate, or when informed by the Department of Legal Affairs that there is information or evidence of the character described in s. 876.27 to be considered by the grand jury, shall charge the grand jury to inquire
into violations of ss. 876.22-876.31 for the purpose of proper action, and further to
inquire generally into the purposes, processes, activities, and any other matters
affecting communism or any related or other subversive organizations,
associations, groups, or persons.

WITH SO MUCH COMPELLING CASE LAW - WHY IS THE PINELLAS SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS OFFICE REFUSING TO TURN OVER ELECTION DATA AND REPORTS?

A few hours after filing the Motion for Judicial Notice, I received notice that there was a notice for appearance filed on behalf of the Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections Office and Julie Marcus and a sworn affidavit from Julie Marcus.

Note the statement from line number 4 below.

If she is familiar with all aspects of election administration, the programming of voting equipment, reporting election results, cyber/physical security procedures, post-election audits, and adherence to Florida Public Records laws then she would be very well versed in all of the points, covered in the Motion for Judicial Notice.

Why would a Constitutional Officer so well-versed in election administration and law knowingly generate forged, altered, uttered “Official Results” and supply them in response to lawful public records requests?

Why would a Constitutional Officer so well-versed in election administration and law knowingly place an excessive charge for simply generating a report REQUIRED?

The Florida statute mandates that the special service charge be “reasonable.” See Carden v. Chief of Police, 696 So. 2d 772, 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), in which the court reviewed a challenge to a service charge that exceeded $4,000 for staff time involved in responding to a public records request, and said that an “excessive charge could well serve to inhibit the pursuit of rights conferred by the Public Records Act.”

In this case, the Pinellas Supervisor of Elections office requested a fee in excess of $10,000 to view “Official Election Reports" and “Data” that was provided at “ZERO” charge by other counties and is REQUIRED by Florida Election Law Statutes.

The image above in FIGURE 1 is one of the EL45A “FINAL OFFICIAL RESULTS” reports that the Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections Office generated and provided through a Public Records Request regarding the 2020 General Election.

The image below is on of the EL45A “FINAL OFFICIAL RESULTS” reports that the LEE County Supervisor of Elections provided through a Public Records Request regarding the 2020 General Election.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHY THE PINELLAS COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS IS TRYING TO HIDE DATA BEHIND AN EXCESSIVE CHARGE TO INHIBIT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ACCESS PUBLIC RECORDS?

Each registered voter in this state has the right to:
#1. Vote and have his or her vote accurately counted.
#9. Vote on a voting system that is in working condition and that will allow votes to be accurately cast.

IS THE RIGHT TO VOTE AND KNOW THAT YOUR VOTE IS ACCURATELY COUNTED IMPORTANT?

Florida courts have decided while certain records may be exempt from disclosure under Chapter 119, these exemptions must be narrowly construed and must not be used to shield information that should be available to the public. State v. City of Clearwater, 863 So. 2d 149, 155 (Fla. 2003): "when the public's interest in disclosure outweighs the governmental interest in maintaining the confidentiality of the records, the records must be disclosed".

IS THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON A VOTING SYSTEM THAT IS IN WORKING CONDITION AND THAT WILL ALLOW VOTES TO BE ACCURATELY CAST IMPORTANT?

The report names may not be mentioned specifically by statute. However, the DATA and content of the reports are.

Florida Statute 98.098(2)(a) Within 30 days after certification by the Elections Canvassing Commission of a presidential preference primary election, special election, primary election, or general election, the supervisors of elections SHALL collect and submit to the department precinct-level election results for the election in a uniform electronic format specified by paragraph (c). The precinct-level election results shall be compiled separately for the primary or special primary election that preceded the general or special general election, respectively.
The results SHALL specifically include for each precinct the total of all ballots cast for each candidate or nominee to fill a national, state, county, or district office or proposed constitutional amendment, with subtotals for each candidate and ballot type. However, ballot type or precinct subtotals in a race or question having fewer than 30 voters voting on the ballot type or in the precinct may not be reported in precinct results. “All ballots cast” means ballots cast by voters who cast a ballot whether at a precinct location, by vote-by-mail ballot including overseas vote-by-mail ballots, during the early voting period, or by provisional ballot.

Words mean things. SHALL and MUST are very clear terms. These terms mean that there is ZERO discretion in the execution of the MANDATED task/duty.

Furthermore, in the sworn statement, made by Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections Julie Marcus she explicitly holds her edicts above the Florida Constitution, Florida Statutes, and the United States Constitution.

The rights of Pinellas County Voters and citizens do not matter to Julie Marcus, your rights to inspect public records, vote, know your vote is accurately cast then counted, and that the voting systems used to cast your ballots are in proper working order are left to her “SOLE DISCRETION” as the Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections.

Never mind the fact that there is clear, concise, convincing, and irrefutable evidence that either Julie Marcus or one of her subordinates forged, altered, modified, and uttered “FINAL OFFICIAL RESULTS” reports.

The system used to generate these reports are so “secure” and “critical to the election infrastructure” that under Julie Marcus’ stewardship they are run on systems with Windows 7 operating systems that illegally have cellular modems that connect via cellular networks and are not certified for use in Florida. In violation of Florida state and Federal election mandates by CISA/DHS.

Access to these systems is only granted to high-ranking personnel in her office under her direct supervision.

The public records requests made were specifically made in electronic format in the manner in which they were kept.

In the case of these “safe, secure and complex devices” the output is in a standard file format with the .LST file extension. The files provided by her office did not comply with the request.

Furthermore, as you can plainly see in the comparison of FIGURE 1 and FIGURE 2 above there were data and fields that were illegally redacted as they were mandated by the Florida Constitution, Florida Statute 119, and Florida Statute 98.098(2)(a).

Q: WHAT IS A BLANK BALLOT?

A: BALLOT THAT WAS CAST AND RECORDED AS HAVING NO MARKS

Q: Who casts a 100% Blank Ballot?

A: For every “BALLOT CAST - BLANK” that is recorded in the EL45A - Election Summary Report, EL30A - Precinct Level Results with Detail, and all the other ELECTION DATA and REPORTS generated in the course of “Official Elections” and “Official Public Duty” paid for by “We the People” is a voter who has been 100% DISENFRANCHISED. They have had their right to cast their vote taken away and their right to have their vote accurately counted has been violated.

Q: WHAT DOES JULIE MARCUS HAVE TO HIDE FROM PUBLIC VIEW?

A: THE NUMBER OF “BALLOTS CAST - BLANK”

B: ALL THE PRECINCT-LEVEL ELECTION DATA REQUIRED BY LAW

C: WHERE THE RIGGING OF ELECTIONS IS OCCURRING

D: ILLEGAL ACTS AND CORRUPT PRACTICES

E: ALL OF THE ABOVE

Any reasonably intellectually honest person will tell you that there is no higher priority for a Constitutional government than free, fair, open, and transparent elections. There is no higher public interest in a free nation of, for and by the people.

WHAT OVERRIDING FACTORS ARE JULIE MARCUS AT HER SOLE DISCRETION USING TO DEPRIVE PINELLAS COUNTY VOTERS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONALLY AND STATUTORY PROTECTED RIGHTS?

We are born free with certain unalienable rights bestowed upon us by GOD our creator. All government power derives from the CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED.

Julie Marcus is the servant of “We the People” she serves at our pleasure, as does the Florida Legislature and the Florida Judiciary. They answer to us. We do not answer to them. If we have selections and not elections, the legitimacy of the government ceases to exist.

If 80% of American voters believe that there is election fraud, voter fraud, and our elections have been compromised what possible defense is there for election officials to hide the election data and reports that are the property of “We the People”?

WHAT ARE THEY HIDING FROM “WE THE PEOPLE”?

A massive RICO enterprise and conspiracy to subvert our Constitutional government and seize control over every branch of government by unlawful means.

876.23 Subversive activities unlawful; penalty.—
(1) It shall be a felony for any person knowingly and willfully to:
(a) Commit, attempt to commit, or aid in the commission of any act intended to overthrow, destroy, to assist the overthrow or destruction of the constitutional form of the Government of the United States, or of the state, or any political subdivision of either of them, by revolution, force, violence, or other unlawful means; or
(b) Advocate, abet, advise, or teach by any means any person to commit, attempt to commit, or assist in the commission of any such act under such circumstances as to constitute a clear and present danger to the security of the United States, or of this state, or of any political subdivision of either of them; or
(c) Conspire with one or more persons to commit any such act; or
(d) Assist in the formation or participate in the management or to contribute to the support of any subversive organization or foreign subversive organization knowing said organization to be a subversive organization or a foreign subversive organization; or
(e) Destroy any books, records, or files, or secrete any funds in this state of a subversive organization or a foreign subversive organization, knowing said organization to be such.
(2) Any person who violates any of the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

The subversive individuals with the Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections Office and their co-conspirators within the Pinellas County Republican Executive Committee will be fully exposed for all to see.

If you want to find out about another option available to Floridians visit The Florida Fix at https://countycongress.com/the-florida-fix/

Stay tuned for the next update. As always my work posted here on this substack is free, however, I would like to thank all those who have opted to help support my efforts here through subscription.

Immutable Truth - Election Integrity

Discussion about this post